Many websites publish content that is professionally solid, but they do not clearly show who is behind it, why that person is qualified, and whether the website can be trusted.

That is a problem for users. It is also a problem for search engines and AI systems.

This is exactly where the RankScan insights “Missing and “Weak come in:

  • “Missing Author Markup”: authors or responsible organizations are not visible enough or are not marked up in a structured way.
  • “Weak Trust Signals”: important trust signals such as contact details, sources, legal notice, privacy policy, update dates or company information are missing or difficult to find.

These insights belong to the topic of Experience, , Authoritativeness and Trust ().

The correct classification is important:

E-E-A-T is not a single technical ranking factor. It is a quality framework that helps assess whether content appears helpful, credible and trustworthy.

This article shows how to make authors visible, strengthen trust signals and implement author markup cleanly — without misunderstanding E-E-A-T as a simple search engine optimization trick.


The in Brief
  • E-E-A-T stands for Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness.
  • Google describes E-E-A-T in the Search Quality Rater Guidelines as a quality concept.
  • Trust is especially central within this framework.
  • E-E-A-T is not a single technical metric and not a direct ranking factor like an tag.
  • Visible author boxes, profile pages and help make responsibility and expertise easier to recognize.
  • Author markup should support visible information, not replace it.
  • Trust signals include contact details, legal notice, privacy policy, sources, reviews, , security and transparent company information.
  • E-E-A-T is especially important for “” topics (YMYL), meaning topics that can affect money, health, safety, legal matters or major life decisions.
  • A good check assesses whether authorship, organization and trust signals are visible, structured and consistent.

What Does E-E-A-T Mean? #

E-E-A-T stands for:

  • Experience: first-hand experience or practical involvement with the topic,
  • Expertise: professional knowledge and competence,
  • Authoritativeness: recognized authority or reputation,
  • Trustworthiness: credibility and trust.

Google explains in the Search Quality Rater Guidelines that experience, expertise, authoritativeness and trust are important considerations when assessing page quality. Trust sits at the center of the E-E-A-T family.
Source: Google Search Quality Rater Guidelines

Google uses quality raters to evaluate search results and measure the quality of its search systems. Rater evaluations do not directly influence the ranking of individual pages, but they help Google assess the quality of its systems.
Source: Google – Search Quality Rater Guidelines: Overview


Is E-E-A-T a Ranking Factor? #

E-E-A-T is not a single technical ranking factor like a , or status code.

A better classification is this:

E-E-A-T describes the characteristics that high-quality, helpful and trustworthy content should have.

In its documentation on helpful, reliable, , Google writes that its automated ranking systems are designed to reward content created for people that is helpful and reliable. The documentation recommends that site owners assess content using questions around experience, expertise, authority and trust.
Source: Google Search Central – Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content

For RankScan, this means:

  • E-E-A-T is not a single score.
  • “Missing Author Markup” does not automatically mean a ranking loss.
  • “Weak Trust Signals” is not one isolated technical error.
  • Both insights point to missing quality, and trust signals.

Why E-E-A-T Matters for Website Health #

E-E-A-T is not only a content topic. It also affects website structure, templates, Schema Markup, author pages and trust elements.

Typical questions include:

  • Is it clear who wrote the content?
  • Is it clear who is responsible for the website?
  • Are there contact options?
  • Are sources cited?
  • Is the content up to date?
  • Are the authors credible?
  • Is there understandable company information?
  • Do visible information and structured data match?
  • Is there evidence of experience or subject-matter expertise?
  • Are legally required information pages easy to find?

When these signals are missing, a page feels more anonymous and less trustworthy — even if the text itself is technically good.


What Does “Missing Author Markup” Mean? #

The RankScan insight “Missing Author Markup” means that relevant content pages lack clear author information or structured author data.

This can take several forms:

  • no visible author name,
  • only “Admin” or “Editorial Team” without further context,
  • no author box,
  • no author page,
  • no connection between article and author,
  • missing author field in Article schema,
  • missing Person or ProfilePage markup,
  • no information about role, experience or area of expertise,
  • no link to LinkedIn, publications or internal profile pages.

Important: not every page needs an individual person as the author. For company pages, the organization itself may be responsible. For expert guides, studies, analyses or YMYL content, however, visible authorship and professional context are especially important.


What Does “Weak Trust Signals” Mean? #

The RankScan insight “Weak Trust Signals” means that a website or page shows too few recognisable trust signals.

Possible missing signals include:

  • no legal notice or clear provider identification,
  • contact details that are hard to find,
  • no About page,
  • no author pages,
  • no source references,
  • no update dates,
  • no privacy information,
  • unclear responsibility,
  • missing reviews or references,
  • insecure connection,
  • outdated content,
  • no information about qualifications or experience,
  • inconsistent company data.

Trust signals must be assessed differently depending on country, industry and website type. A Swiss B2B agency needs different signals from a medical portal, a financial guide or an online shop.


YMYL: When E-E-A-T Is Especially Important #

Google uses the term YMYL for topics that affect health, finances, safety, law or important life decisions.

With these topics, incorrect information can cause real harm. That is why visible expertise, sources, freshness and responsibility are especially important.

Examples of YMYL topics:

  • medical advice,
  • finance and pension topics,
  • insurance,
  • legal information,
  • safety,
  • important purchase decisions,
  • political or socially sensitive topics.

For RankScan, this means:

The higher the risk of a topic, the more important authorship, sources, freshness and trust signals become.


Making Authors Visible: The Editorial Layer #

The first step is not . The first step is visible authorship.

A good author box includes:

  • name,
  • photo or professional profile image,
  • role or function,
  • short professional bio,
  • relevant experience,
  • link to the author page,
  • optionally LinkedIn or other official profiles,
  • optionally certificates, publications or specialisations.

Example:

Author: Max Muster
Senior Consultant with 12 years of experience in technical SEO, website audits and content strategy. Max supports B2B and e-commerce websites across the DACH region and writes about website health, and .

A good author box answers not only “who?”, but also “why should I trust this person?”.


Author Pages: Bundling Expertise #

For expert websites, author pages are particularly useful.

A good author page includes:

  • name,
  • photo,
  • role,
  • short biography,
  • areas of expertise,
  • publications on the website,
  • external profiles,
  • certificates or qualifications,
  • contact or editorial affiliation,
  • optionally media appearances or talks.

Example URL:

text
https://example.ch/authors/max-muster/

Author pages help users and search engines better understand the person behind the content.


Author Markup: The Technical Layer #

Visible authorship should be supported by structured data.

For articles, the author field in Article or BlogPosting markup is especially relevant. In Article structured data, Google recommends using author.url to link to a page that uniquely identifies the author. If this is an internal profile page, Google recommends marking that profile page up with ProfilePage structured data.
Source: Google Search Central – Article structured data

Example with author:

html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Article",
  "headline": "E-E-A-T: Make Authors Visible and Strengthen Trust Signals",
  "author": {
    "@type": "Person",
    "name": "Max Muster",
    "url": "https://example.ch/authors/max-muster/"
  },
  "publisher": {
    "@type": "Organization",
    "name": "Example AG",
    "url": "https://example.ch/"
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-06-07",
  "dateModified": "2026-06-07"
}
</script>

Person and ProfilePage Markup #

ProfilePage can be useful for author pages.

Google describes ProfilePage structured data as markup for pages where creators — people or organizations — share their own perspectives. It can help Google better understand creators.
Source: Google Search Central – ProfilePage structured data

Example:

html
<script type="application/ld+json">
{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "ProfilePage",
  "mainEntity": {
    "@type": "Person",
    "@id": "https://example.ch/authors/max-muster/#person",
    "name": "Max Muster",
    "jobTitle": "Senior SEO Consultant",
    "worksFor": {
      "@type": "Organization",
      "name": "Example AG",
      "url": "https://example.ch/"
    },
    "knowsAbout": [
      "Technical SEO",
      "Website Health",
      "Content Strategy"
    ],
    "sameAs": [
      "https://www.linkedin.com/in/max-muster/"
    ]
  }
}
</script>

Important:

  • Markup must match the visible content.
  • Do not invent qualifications.
  • Do not use fake authors.
  • Use sameAs only for official profiles.
  • Author pages should be if they are intended to act as trust signals.

Google states in its general structured data guidelines that structured data should represent the visible page content.
Source: Google Search Central – General Structured Data Guidelines


Website-Level Trust Signals #

Trust signals do not only apply to individual articles. They apply to the entire website.

Important website-level signals include:

  • legal notice or clear provider information,
  • privacy policy,
  • contact page with real contact options,
  • About page,
  • team or author pages,
  • secure connection,
  • understandable company information,
  • consistent address, phone number and email,
  • official social profiles,
  • customer references,
  • reviews,
  • certifications,
  • transparent pricing or service descriptions,
  • clear editorial responsibility.

For DACH websites, provider identification, privacy, contact and transparency are especially important. The specific legal requirements depend on the country, website type and business model and should be checked legally where necessary.


Content-Level Trust Signals #

An individual article can also contain trust signals.

Important content-level signals include:

  • visible author,
  • short professional author description,
  • publication date,
  • update date,
  • source references,
  • links to primary sources,
  • clear separation of opinion, advertising and information,
  • review or fact-check note,
  • transparent methodology,
  • genuine experience or tests,
  • images from real practice,
  • notes on limitations or uncertainties.

Especially for guide articles, users should be able to recognize whether the content is current, has been checked, and is owned by a competent person or organization.


Trust Signals for Companies and Shops #

Companies, service providers and shops need additional signals.

Companies and B2B Websites #

  • real team page,
  • case studies,
  • customer logos,
  • references,
  • clear service descriptions,
  • address and location,
  • industry expertise,
  • certifications,
  • partnerships,
  • publications or talks.

Shops #

  • shipping information,
  • returns and cancellation policies,
  • secure payment methods,
  • reviews,
  • real contact information,
  • delivery times,
  • transparent prices,
  • product availability,
  • support channels,
  • company data.

Local Providers #

  • address,
  • opening hours,
  • phone number,
  • Google Business Profile,
  • local reviews,
  • directions,
  • photos of the location or team.

Prioritisation: Which E-E-A-T Issues Really Matter? #

Not every missing trust signal has the same relevance.

ProblemPriorityWhy
No clear provider / no legal notice on a commercial websiteHighfundamental trust issue
YMYL article without author and sourcesHighhigh risk for sensitive topics
Expert article without visible authorshipMedium to highresponsibility and expertise are missing
Author visible, but no author markupMediumtechnical support is missing
Author pages exist, but are thinMediumexpertise is not sufficiently substantiated
No update dates on guide articlesMediumfreshness is difficult to assess
No sources for fact-based articlesMedium to highcredibility suffers
Missing reviews for a shopMediumdepends on competition and industry
Missing social profiles in markupLow to mediumhelpful, but not always critical
Small lifestyle site without formal author profilesLow to mediumdepends on the topic

The most important rule:

The more sensitive the topic and the greater the business relevance, the more important visible authorship, sources and trust signals become.


Content Error or Template Error? #

A good check distinguishes whether an issue affects individual content or the system.

Content Error #

Examples:

  • an article has no author,
  • a guide has no sources,
  • an author profile is empty,
  • a date is outdated,
  • a bio is too generic,
  • a page names no responsible person or organization.

Solution: add or improve the content.

Template or CMS Error #

Examples:

  • the author is maintained in the , but not displayed on the frontend,
  • Article schema contains no author,
  • all articles show “Admin”,
  • author pages are ,
  • the author box is shown only on mobile or only on desktop,
  • dateModified is missing in the template,
  • Person markup is not output,
  • global is missing.

Solution: fix the template, data model or schema component.

Template errors are often more important because they affect many pieces of content at once.


What to Do After a RankScan Finding #

When RankScan reports “Missing Author Markup” or “Weak Trust Signals”, proceed in a structured way.

Step 1: Determine the Page Type #

Check whether the page is a:

  • blog article,
  • guide,
  • product page,
  • service page,
  • About page,
  • author page,
  • category,
  • shop page,
  • YMYL page.

The page type determines which trust signals make sense.


Step 2: Assess Risk and Relevance #

Ask:

  • Is the topic YMYL?
  • Does the page have organic visibility?
  • Is it commercially important?
  • Is professional expertise expected?
  • Does it contain advice or recommendations?
  • Is the page indexable?
  • Is author data already available in the CMS?

Step 3: Clarify Authorship #

Decide:

Individual author?
Organisation as publisher?
Editorial team?
Professionally reviewed by an expert?

For expert articles, it can make sense to include:

  • author,
  • professional reviewer,
  • update date,
  • source list.

Step 4: Add Visible Trust Signals #

Depending on the page:

  • author box,
  • author page,
  • sources,
  • update date,
  • contact details,
  • About link,
  • company data,
  • certificates,
  • references,
  • customer reviews,
  • review note.

Step 5: Add Structured Data #

Depending on page type:

text
Article / BlogPosting → author, publisher, datePublished, dateModified
ProfilePage → Person
Organization → company
LocalBusiness → location
Review / AggregateRating → only for visible, genuine reviews

Step 6: Validate and Re-Crawl #

Check:

  • Google Test,
  • Schema Markup Validator,
  • Google Search Console,
  • RankScan re-crawl.

Make sure visible content and match.


What a Good E-E-A-T Check Looks For #

A good E-E-A-T check should not create the illusion of a simple “score”. It should check concrete signals.

A good check recognises:

  • Is a visible author missing?
  • Is there only “Admin” or “Editorial Team” without context?
  • Is there an author box?
  • Is there an author page?
  • Is the author page indexable?
  • Is there Article markup with author?
  • Is there ProfilePage or Person markup?
  • Do the visible author and markup match?
  • Is there an update date?
  • Are sources provided for fact-based articles?
  • Are contact and provider details available?
  • Is there an About page?
  • Is Organization data present?
  • Are social profiles consistent?
  • Are trust signals missing on commercial pages?
  • Are YMYL pages especially weakly documented?
  • Does the issue affect individual content or a template?

This turns “Missing Author Markup” and “Weak Trust Signals” into concrete improvement tasks.


Common E-E-A-T Mistakes #

Mistake 1: Fake Authors #

Invented experts are risky and destroy trust if discovered.

Better: real people, real roles, real experience.


Mistake 2: Authors Only in Markup, Not Visible #

Author markup does not replace visible authorship. Users must be able to see who is responsible.


Mistake 3: “Admin” as Author #

“Admin” says nothing about experience, expertise or responsibility.


Mistake 4: Author Pages Without Substance #

An author page with only a name and image is weak. It should show experience, areas of expertise and published content.


Mistake 5: No Sources for Facts #

Fact-based claims should link to primary sources, studies, authorities or official documentation.


Mistake 6: Outdated Content Without a Date #

Freshness is especially important in SEO, law, health, finance and technology.


Mistake 7: Hiding Trust Signals Only in the Footer #

Contact, provider information and responsibility should be findable and understandable.


Mistake 8: Exaggerated Trust Claims #

Certificates, reviews and awards must be real and verifiable. Fake trust signals do more harm than good.


Example: Guide Without Author or Trust Signals #

Starting Point #

A B2B website publishes many expert articles. The content is solid, but all posts appear under:

Author: Admin

There are no author pages, no Article markup with author, no sources and no update date.

RankScan reports:

“Missing Author Markup”
“Weak Trust Signals”

Analysis #

The issue does not affect individual articles only. It affects the blog template.

Solution #

  1. Make the author field mandatory in the CMS.
  2. Output the author box in the template.
  3. Create author pages.
  4. Add Article schema with author, publisher, datePublished and dateModified.
  5. Add a sources section for fact-based articles.
  6. Link Organization schema and the About page.
  7. Re-crawl after deployment.

Result #

The website shows more clearly who creates the content, what expertise is behind it and which organization is responsible. This does not guarantee rankings, but it strengthens transparency, trust and machine-readable authorship.


Checklist: Strengthen Authors and Trust Signals #

Use this checklist:

  • Does every expert article have a visible author?
  • Are there author boxes?
  • Are there indexable author pages?
  • Are role, experience and areas of expertise listed?
  • Is there Article markup with author?
  • Is there ProfilePage or Person markup?
  • Do visible author data and JSON-LD match?
  • Are datePublished and dateModified present?
  • Are sources included for fact-based articles?
  • Is there an About page?
  • Are clear contact details available?
  • Is provider information easy to find?
  • Is HTTPS active?
  • Are reviews, references or certificates genuine and verifiable?
  • Are trust signals especially strong on YMYL pages?
  • Was the site re-crawled after the fix?

In addition, Entity SEO, Thin Content and High-Quality Content, AI Mentions and Citations and Generative Engine Optimization help narrow down the cause and prioritize the next SEO actions.

FAQ About E-E-A-T, Author Markup and Trust Signals #

What Is E-E-A-T?

E-E-A-T stands for Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness. It is a quality concept from Google’s Search Quality Rater Guidelines.

Is E-E-A-T a Direct Ranking Factor?

No. E-E-A-T is not a single technical ranking factor. It describes quality characteristics that support helpful and trustworthy content.

What Is Author Markup?

Author markup is structured data that marks up authors or responsible organizations in a machine-readable way.

Does Every Article Need an Author?

For expert guides, analyses and YMYL content, a visible author or a clear responsible organization is highly useful. For simple product or service pages, the organization may be sufficient.

What Makes a Good Author Box?

A good author box states the name, role, experience and area of expertise and links to an author page or official profile.

What Are Trust Signals on a Website?

Trust signals are elements that create trust, such as contact details, legal notice, privacy policy, sources, reviews, references, HTTPS, update dates and transparent company information.

Is Person Markup Enough for E-E-A-T?

No. Markup alone is not enough. The information must be visible, credible and supported by the content.

What Does “Missing Author Markup” Mean in RankScan?

This insight means that no sufficient structured author markup was found on relevant content pages.

What Does “Weak Trust Signals” Mean in RankScan?

This insight indicates that important trust signals are missing or difficult to find.

Are Trust Signals Important for ?

They can help make content more credible and easier to classify. However, they do not guarantee mentions in AI answers.


Conclusion: Make E-E-A-T Visible Instead of Merely Claiming It #

E-E-A-T is not a technical shortcut to better rankings. It is a quality framework for credible, helpful and trustworthy content.

The RankScan insights “Missing Author Markup” and “Weak Trust Signals” show where important signals are missing: Who created the content? What experience is behind it? Who is responsible? Which sources, contact options and company information create trust?

The best approach is:

  1. identify relevant page types,
  2. clarify authorship and responsibility,
  3. add visible author boxes and profile pages,
  4. strengthen trust signals at website and content level,
  5. implement Author, Article, Person and Organization markup cleanly,
  6. align visible content and structured data,
  7. re-crawl after the fix.

This turns E-E-A-T from an empty buzzword into a concrete website-health process for more transparency, better user orientation and stronger trust signals.


Sources and Further Reading #